by Ned Vare
Isn't it amazing how many five year olds go off to school as
bright, curious, trusting ("gifted and talented") kids, and in a year or two
become dull, angry little aliens?
Parents who expect the government schools to provide high quality
academic education for smart children will always be frustrated. It's simply not offered.
Those parents need to understand that the public schools are intended to offer only a
minimum level of academic learning -- nothing more. In fact, the employees are not even
academically oriented beyond the minimum level.
Despite their claims, they don't even recognize talents or gifts.
So, when the school employees say,"We can't do anything for your gifted child,"
they aren't kidding. In fact, officially, they are not designed to. The official
egalitarian attitude says, "We want everyone to be the same," and, unfortunately
for those who are gifted, same means mediocre.The truth is that "gifted and
talented" programs are fast-track indoctrination courses, not real academics.
The public school system has four purposes:
1. Economic: to keep children out of the job market until they're
grown, to provide jobs for adults; and to provide child care for working parents.
2. Social: to indoctrinate children to the culture (originally it
was to protestantize Catholic immigrants, but now it is for social engineering, mixing
races -- they call it "diversity," when it's really homogenization.
3. Political: to teach attitudes such as political correctness and
consumerism.
4. Academic: offer a minimum body of skills and knowledge.
Parents are not well aware of the first three, but those are
performed fairly well by the government schools. "Gifted and talented" programs
are simply more intensive indoctrination courses, not real academics. It's that fourth
purpose -- academic -- that lets most parents and children down as the schools are getting
worse all the time by watering down the content and lowering standards, while increasing
the social and political agendas.
The schools not only can't offer Johnny what he needs, but they
don't know what he needs, are not interested in finding out, and couldn't provide it if
they wanted to.The typical employee of a State Dep. of Ed. would say: "Our interest
is in seeing that everyone reaches our learning standards."
What they leave out is how incredibly low those standards are, and
that they are intended to be low. Under these circumstances, bright kids, and even many
average ones, become "behavior problems" because they are so bored,
disrespected, misunderstood, and know they are being warehoused.
Under these conditions, it is the kids who serve the needs of the
public schools, not the other way round. Parents need to realize that the only
unproductive part of a child's day is when he/she is in school. The experience is damaging
for most, especially the bright ones. Our son was unschooled -- he never went to school,
never even looked at a school book; but is now among the top two percent (2%) of Hunter
College (NYC) students academically, and has a grand social life and part-time work to
boot. He and thousands like him have shown that schooling, especially government
schooling, is unnecessary and irrelevant -- especially for the gifted and talented.