It is
sometimes said, by public school supporters, that if some children are taken out of the
system to go to other schools, the public schools will deteriorate. And so, the thinking
goes, parents have a "duty to society" to keep their kids in the public schools,
even though they have already deteriorated almost beyond recognition. How absurd that the
government schools think of the children as serving the schools' or society's needs
instead of the other way around.
It's not the school system that needs saving, or even reforming.
It's the children who need to escape from the failing government schools and be allowed to
home school or attend successful private schools, without the penalty of paying twice --
once with taxes and again for tuition.
The real question is, do we want the best education we can get for
our children, or do we merely want to maintain the government school monopoly, no matter
how bad it gets or how much it costs? Contrary to the argument that's sometimes heard,
saving some children from bad schools does not doom the rest of them; it simply saves
some. And that is obviously better, by whatever means is available, than saving none. As
long as schools are under the control of politicians and government bureaucrats, hand in
hand with the teachers' unions, the education will not be "healthy" because
politics kills education. Government incentives prevent the needed reforms and
innovations. Think of all the instruction in government schools that's mandated by
politicians because of pressure from various interest groups and campaign contributors. It
takes up about half of every school day at the expense of what most parents expect from
the schools -- core academics.
What's wrong is that the government is not a proper agency for
education. It thrives on its own failure -- the worse it does, the more money politicians
give it. While state-run schools fail at high cost, private parent-directed and funded
schools succeed at half the per-student cost. The problem is that government schools do
not seek the same things that parents seek for their children. Government wants compliant
predictable citizens; parents want independent thinking creative individuals. The two
goals are not compatible. Parents need the freedom to choose where their children will go
to school, and that choice must include private and religious schools. No child should be
forced to attend a bad school, and no one should be forced to pay ever-higher taxes to
prop up a failing system.
Government is the problem in education, just as it is in other
areas (medicine, welfare, etc.) and the private sector is the solution. State-run schools
will not reform themselves, ever. Education, and the money that pays for it, needs to be
put back into the hands of parents and removed from politics. Parents must have the right
to spend their own money for the schooling they choose. End the failure. End the monopoly,
End the corruption. End the blame game. Save the children.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world; indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." Margaret
Mead
"All education has three dimensions: knowledge, skills, and
values.... The diversity of values supported by parents, and the differing hopes they hold
for their children, cannot be adequately addressed by a 'common school system,' even if it
is well funded and staffed with competent, caring teachers.... By eliminating the
politically-determined imposition of values, we can promote social harmony, protect
parental rights and responsibilities, and enable schools, teachers, and students to
flourish in an environment of full educational freedom." from The Proclamation for
the Separation of School and State. Marshall Fritz, founder of The Separation of School
and State Alliance, is well on the way to his goal of gathering 25 million signatures and
establishing an Alliance chapter in each state. For more information, contact SSSA, 4578
North First #310, Fresno, CA 93726 phone 209-292-1776